<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Isso on Apfel hammer</title>
		<link>https://apfelhammer.de/tags/isso/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Isso on Apfel hammer</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-en</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://apfelhammer.de/tags/isso/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Update on Apfelhammer.de - Bashblog with webmention and isso comments</title>
				<link>https://apfelhammer.de/posts/update-on-apfelhammerde---bashblog-with-webmention-and-isso-comments/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://apfelhammer.de/posts/update-on-apfelhammerde---bashblog-with-webmention-and-isso-comments/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;So, this post is an update to my &amp;ldquo;weblog engine&amp;rdquo; &lt;strong&gt;Bashblog&lt;/strong&gt;. This is a &lt;em&gt;Shellscript&lt;/em&gt;&#xA;wich renders my weblog in static html files, like all the other static website&#xA;generators like Jekyll or Pelikan or you name it do. But there is a difference:&#xA;for &lt;!-- raw HTML omitted --&gt;bb.sh&lt;!-- raw HTML omitted --&gt; you only need the standard linux tools like awk, sed etc. pp., and&#xA;this works with a nice css file out of the box really good.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ISSO Comments with Bashblog</title>
				<link>https://apfelhammer.de/posts/isso-comments-with-bashblog/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://apfelhammer.de/posts/isso-comments-with-bashblog/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Comments belongs to the website. So I newly established this weblog and I am a great fan of comments.&#xA;Because were is the place to talk about a topic? Directly under the topic,&#xA;right. I now publish with a simple Shell-Script (Bashblog) and there is&#xA;no commenting system built in, the author helped out with integrating&#xA;Disqus, which is known for being a wideley used commenting hoster.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;And there is the point to talk: I think comments belong to the commenters&#xA;and to the website were the comments are said, but definitely comments are&#xA;no big data and therefore should not be outsourced to a third-party company&#xA;like disqus is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
